The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.
The product was used for laparoscopic therapeutic treatment of a ventral hernia.
It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrence, significant intra-abdominal adhesions, previous mesh that was placed for the ventral hernia previously was parachuting up into the defect so the entire mesh was ballooning up into the defect, and bilateral component separation with bilateral musculocutaneous advancement flaps.
Post-operative patient treatment included recurrent incisional ventral hernia repair with new mesh as well as the mesh was intimately involved with the skin so it would need to have surgical excision of the skin in order to free the mesh.
Exploratory laparotomy, complex closure of 20 cm, and explant of previous mesh were also performed.
|