H.6.Investigation: review of dhr revealed all required challenge samples, set-up and in process testing was performed in accordance with the quality plans.Review disclosed four non-related qn¿s were initiated on the build of this lot that would not impact the outcome of the quality of the product relevant to the defect stated in the pir.Received on 4/11/2019, one unused unit in a sealed package from catalog number 383512, lot number 8310636 and one unused unit in a sealed package with no labeling on the package label.Five photos were submitted for review: photo one displayed two package label, package on top had package label with print and fm and the bottom package was missing the package print.O photo two displayed the two nexiva 22ga units in packaging.The top package had fm.O photo three displayed a closeup of fm on the package.O photo four displayed a closeup of fm o photo five displayed a closeup of fm visual/microscopic evaluation: unit 1 had fm on the package label.O the blue line on the package label was out of alignment.The blue line should be closer to the edge of the package unit 2 was missing the packaging print information o the blue line on the package label was out of alignment the blue line should be closer to the edge of the package comparison between correct alignment and incorrect alignment (the correct position of the colored strip on the package label is along the top edge of the package) photos: based on the evaluation of the submitted photos; the photos displayed fm, missing print and the incorrect alignment of the package top web (label).Which is the same finding as that of the evaluation of the returned unit.The defects foreign matter and label content missing were identified and confirmed with the returned unit.The fm on the package was identified as the ink used for the print on the package label.The package top web (label) was mis-aligned.The correct position of the colored strip on the package label is along the top edge of the package.To fix the alignment issues when the guards are off, the machine will run nor print.The missing print from the package label is was from the machine operator has to wait seven cycles and remove all defective parts from the multivac.The product associated with this incident report was not removed due to human error.The units shown for this incident were packaged during this process and the operator failed to reject them.The top web can become misaligned on the unit package when the top web splice is out of alignment or if the top web breaks at the printer.Furthermore, if the top web breaks at the printer, there will be units that do not contain print once the web is spliced.Operators are required to follow top web splices through the process to ensure the spliced units are rejected by the machine.Additionally in that scenario, they are supposed to ensure that any other print or top web discrepancies are rejected from the machine.
|