At approximately 15:10, on (b)(6) 2019, it was reported by (b)(6) by a phone call to the siw design office, that the surgeon mr (b)(6) was having difficulty inserting the jts revision prosthesis (pin21882).
Mr (b)(6) requested the attendance of a design engineer in surgery to troubleshoot why the device was not fitting as intended.
(b)(6) went to theatres in (b)(6) as requested and (b)(6) entered theatre 7.
The device was confirmed to not fit as intended.
The surgeon reinserted the original proximal component and scribed a line on the end of the shaft to annotate the femoral neck angle.
He removed this component and inserted the revision component and scribed the neck angle.
The discrepancy between the two scribed lines was approximately 90 degrees.
On discussion, the surgeon decided to leave the distal femoral component of the jts in situ as the patient still had a leg length discrepancy.
On further discussion, the surgeon decided to retain the original proximal component as a spacer scaffold onto which a mets trochanter was cemented allowing the surgeon to close the patient with a view to revising at a later date.
The pin numbers being revised were bme(pin)12560 and bme(pin)13138.
There was a surgical delay of 30-60 minutes.
|