• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number PCO3020
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Bacterial Infection (1735); Cellulitis (1768); Granuloma (1876); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Staphylococcus Aureus (2058); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Impaired Healing (2378); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Fluid Discharge (2686); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent hernia, adhesions, abscess; fluid drainage; granulation, staphylococcal infection post-operative patient treatment included removal surgery.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent hernia, adhesions, abscess; fluid drainage; granulation, staphylococcal infection post-operative patient treatment included lysis of adhesions, revision and removalsurgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic. the fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.  due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent hernia, adhesions, abscess; fluid drainage; granulation, staphylococcal infection, non-healing abdominal wound, infected mesh, cellulitis, and serosal injury.Post-operative patient treatment included lysis of adhesions, revision and removal of infected mesh.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent hernia, dense adhesions, abscess, fluid drainage, granulation, staphylococcal infection, open non-healing abdominal wound, infected mesh, cellulitis, and serosal injury.Post-operative patient treatment included lysis of adhesions, difficulty manipulating previous mesh during dissection, incision and drainage, wound vac, revision surgery, removal of infected mesh and additional implants for recurrence repairs.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Additional information: a4(weight in lbs), b5, b7, g4 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced recurrent hernia, dense adhesions, abscess, fluid drainage, granulation, staphylococcal infection, open non-healing abdominal wound, infected mesh, cellulitis, obstruction, pain and serosal injury.Post-operative patient treatment included lysis of adhesions, difficulty manipulating previous mesh during dissection, incision and drainage, wound vac, revision surgery, removal of infected mesh, central venous catheter placement and additional implants for recurrence repairs.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: h6 (added patient code ime e2402: "sinus tract").Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated upper midline ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced sinus tracts, recurrent hernia, dense adhesions, abscess, fluid drainage, granulation, staphylococcal infection, open non-healing abdominal wound, infected mesh, cellulitis, obstruction, pain and serosal injury.Post-operative patient treatment included use of french blake drains, medication, ct scan, mesh revision, lysis of adhesions, difficulty manipulating previous mesh during dissection, incision and drainage, wound vac, revision surgery, removal of infected mesh, central venous catheter placement and additional implants for recurrence repairs.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH SOFRADIM - PARIETEX¿ COMPOSITE MESH
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR   01600
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
5920 longbow drive
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view,mn, CO 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key8514962
MDR Text Key141954635
Report Number9615742-2019-01285
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K040998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/15/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2012
Device Model NumberPCO3020
Device Catalogue NumberPCO3020
Device Lot NumberPIA00429
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight59 KG
-
-