• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problems Computer Software Problem (1112); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems Fall (1848); Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Event Date 04/02/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Patient had tka with mako on 4/1 and fell the morning of 4/2 and fractured the femur where surgeon feels implant was notching femur.Case type: tka.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding periprosthetic fracture due to implant notching involving 3.0 rio® robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.It was reported ¿patient had tka with mako on 4/1 and fell the morning of 4/2 and fractured the femur where surgeon feels implant was notching femur.¿ method & results: product evaluation and results: a review of the session file, software log file, and crisis log files from the reported event was completed to investigate the reported notching event.A review of the presurgery checks, robot registration and verification, bone registration and checkpoint capture, and warnings and errors showed that all quality metrics were within passing range and there were no logged warnings or errors that may have contributed to the reported event.A review of the implant plan showed that the implant flange was planned nearly coincident to the femur bone surface at a component flexion of 3.9 degrees.The provided x-rays show some run-off above the anterior flange of the component, which can be seen as planned on the implant planning page.A review of the tool position during the anterior resection showed that some bone may have remained near the implant anterior flange, which may have contributed to the reported event.A review of the available data showed that the mako system operated within specifications.No system defect or malfunction is suspected.Product history review: review of the device history records associated with rio 109 indicate quality inspection procedures were completed with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: a search of the complaint database under device identification pn 209999 reports similar complaints for tka software - software error.Conclusions: a review of the session file, software log file, and crisis log files from the reported event was completed to investigate the reported notching event.A review of the presurgery checks, robot registration and verification, bone registration and checkpoint capture, and warnings and errors showed that all quality metrics were within passing range and there were no logged warnings or errors that may have contributed to the reported event.A review of the implant plan showed that the implant flange was planned nearly coincident to the femur bone surface at a component flexion of 3.9 degrees.The provided x-rays show some run-off above the anterior flange of the component, which can be seen as planned on the implant planning page.A review of the tool position during the anterior resection showed that some bone may have remained near the implant anterior flange, which may have contributed to the reported event.A review of the available data showed that the mako system operated within specifications.No system defect or malfunction is suspected.No additional investigation or specific actions are required at this time.If additional information is received such as the session files, then the complaint will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient had tka with mako on 4/1 and fell the morning of 4/2 and fractured the femur where surgeon feels implant was notching femur.Case type: tka.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8517692
MDR Text Key142038303
Report Number3005985723-2019-00298
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/16/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/13/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-