It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the internal and common carotid artery.A rx accunet embolic protection system (eps) was advanced.A 7-10x40mm.014 acculink ii rx stent was advanced to the target lesion and the stent was deployed without issues.An attempt was made to retrieve the eps filter with one of the retrieval catheter provided per the instructions for use; however, the filter would not fully engage with the retrieval catheter.It was then decided to attempt to use the second retrieval catheter provided in the 3-in-1 rx accunet eps.An attempt to remove the first retrieval catheter was made; however, since the filter was partially engaged with the retrieval catheter the filter separated from the wire and landed at the proximal end of the deployed acculink stent.Balloon angioplasty was performed a couple of times to facilitate filter movement and a 7x20mm.014 acculink ii rx stent was deployed to appose the filter against the vessel wall.The patient is fine and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
Internal file number - (b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.The difficulty removing (recovering the filter) could not be tested as the filter was not returned.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other similar incidents.The investigation was unable to determine a definitive cause for the reported difficulties.It may be possible that the filter was over-loaded with emboli such that the filter was unable to collapse into the recovery catheter, and when force was applied, the filter detached from the wire.However, this could not be confirmed.The additional treatment to appose the detached filter against the vessel wall was related to case circumstances.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|