BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VALITUDE X4 CRT-P; PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER, IMPLANTABLE, WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION (CRT-P)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number U128 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Syncope (1610); Fall (1848); Pain (1994)
|
Event Date 02/08/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this pacemaker had a syncopal episode and presented to the emergency room.A device interrogation there was unremarkable and she was referred to her physician.She had also conducted a session via remote patient monitoring; this was reviewed by her device clinic and was also unremarkable.In addition to pain from falling on her tailbone during the syncopal episode, the patient reported having an atrial arrhythmia, palpitations, and a deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The er physician did not believe that the dvt contributed to the syncopal episode.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.
|
|
Event Description
|
This report is being filed to submit the results of device analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the device was performed.A visual inspection of the device header and case noted no anomalies aside from a hole in the right ventricular seal plug.Pin gauge testing, designed to verify proper port dimensions, was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|