A correction to g5 was made to the 510k.X-ray provided confirmed 1 blocker was loose in a construct requiring a revision surgery.Visual and functional inspection could not be performed as device was not returned.Complaint history records were not reviewed as a valid lot number was not provided and could not be obtained.Manufacturing history records were not reviewed as a valid lot number was not provided and could not be obtained.It was reported that there were no complications during initial surgery, the stryker approved torque limiting driver was used to 12nm with counter torque.The screws were not at difficult angles.It is unknown what the patient's post op activity was and if the patient experienced a fall.The patient was reported to have very poor bone quality.4 of the 5 blockers returned showed witness marks indicative of 12nm of torque being evenly applied across the blocker.One blocker showed signs of off loading, which means the rod was not evenly seated across the blocker.This could cause this blocker to loosen over time as the blocker did not have even contact on the rod and 12nm was not fully applied across the rod to hold it in place.This can be caused by the rod not being fully seated into the tulip before final tightening.With one blocker not fully tightened, it could cause instability in the construct, leading to the other blockers loosening over time.Additionally, with the patient having very poor bone quality, this would contribute to the overall instability of the construct as the screws and rods would be subject to more movement and forces compared to normal bone.
|