At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges surgical intervention and that the patient underwent anterior/posterior repair of cystocele, rectocele, incontinence.A manufacturing review that included review of sterility records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Regarding infection; the warning section of the instructions-for-use states, ¿if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.The prosthesis may not have to be removed." should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: on(b)(6) 2007: the patient was diagnosed with a rectocele, cystocele, stress urinary incontinence (sui) and underwent a transobturator sling procedure with implant of a non davol pelvisoft mesh and implant of a non davol pelvilace mesh for a cystocele/rectocele repair.On (b)(6) 2010: the patient was diagnosed with urinary frequency/urgency, urethral stricture and underwent an abd sacrocolpopexy with implant of a bard/davol flat mesh plus cystoscopy with urethral dilation.On(b)(6) 2013: the patient was diagnosed with cystocele, rectocele, incontinence and underwent anterior/posterior repair with implant of a non bard/davol "advantage fit sling" and a non bard/davol "xenform" mesh.Ni/ni/ni: the patient alleges ¿bleeding, strong pain, infection, bad odor, problem with sexual relation with ex-husband, caused divorce and mental problems (feel low, self esteem), vaginal wall prolapse with first degree cystocele, overactive bladder, urinary frequency, cystocele, rectocele, incontinence¿ as a result of the implantation of the pelvic mesh product(s)." patient reports currently experiencing urinary incontinence, pain and sometimes urinary tract infection.
|