Our product evaluation laboratory received one model 139f75 swan-ganz catheter with a contamination shield, a 1.5cc monoject syringe, and two single dpts.The balloon was found to be ruptured.The rupture edges did not appear to match up.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.No other visible damage or abnormality was observed from the catheter body, syringe and dpts.A device history record review was completed and documented that the device met all specifications upon distribution.The customer report of a balloon issue was confirmed on evaluation.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.It is standard practice to check balloon integrity by inflating it to the recommended volume in order to detect any asymmetry or leakage condition before use of the catheter.When there is separation of the balloon or fragments from the pulmonary artery catheter, the retained fragment will embolize to the lungs.Due to the large surface area of the pulmonary vasculature, this is generally well tolerated, but can lead to complications such as infection or small infarction.Pulmonary complications may result from improper inflation technique.To avoid damage to the pulmonary artery and possible balloon rupture, the balloon should not be inflated above the recommended volume.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, no measurements could be performed with a swan-ganz catheter.The device had worked properly prior to placement on (b)(6) 2019.The suspect catheter was removed and the customer observed the balloon was perforated.A new swan-ganz catheter was placed and the issue was solved.There was no allegation of patient injury.Patient demographics were requested and not provided.The hospital had originally reported the product to have been lost; however, it was eventually located and returned.
|