Prior to shipment of the device to the manufacturer, two photographs were provided of the device, which demonstrated a 5cm open pouch seal at the side, exposing the device within the pouch.The device was received for evaluation at the manufacturing facility on june 16, 2019.The results of the product investigation have not yet been provided.
|
Review of the device history record and product release decision control sheet of the involved product/lot# confirmed that there were not any indications of anomalies.A search of complaint files did not find any similar report with the involved product/lot# combination.Visual inspection upon receipt found that the peel pack had an opening approx.60mm in length on the location around the hub of the inner catheter packed in the peel pack, where the film had been separated from the nonwoven fabric.There was not any other anomaly, such as a break or separation of the materials, on the remainders of the peel pack.The inner surfaces of the separated film and nonwoven fabric were electron microscopically inspection.On the surface of the film some transcribed fiber patterns of the nonwoven fabric were noted.The nonwoven fabric was found to have the evidence of adhesive applied there.These states were confirmed to be comparable to those of the separated film and nonwoven fabric of a current peel pack sample.The sealing strength of the actual peel pack sample was confirmed to meet the specification.A test to reproduce the issue was conducted.The difference in the atmospheric pressure during the transportation being taken into consideration, a test sample from the involved product code/lot# combination was inflated by applying an air pressure inside the peel pack and put into the unit box.This sample was then exposed to shock force by dropping a load on it.As the result, an opening was generated on the location around the hub of the inner catheter packed in the peel pack, where the film had been separated from the nonwoven fabric.The state was confirmed to be very similar to that of the actual sample as one of the possibilities, the following scenario can be inferred: due to the difference in the atmospheric pressure during transportation to the warehouse, the peel pack of the actual sample became swollen inside the unit box.In this state, the actualsample was subjected to shock force which exceeded the sealing strength of the peel pack, resulting in the generation of the opening.From the available information, however, it is difficult to determine the cause of this complaint definitely.
|