• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOPERSURGICAL, INC. REDFIELD IRC 2100 INFRARED COAGULATOR; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOPERSURGICAL, INC. REDFIELD IRC 2100 INFRARED COAGULATOR; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Model Number IRC-HS1
Device Problems Device Reprocessing Problem (1091); Labelling, Instructions for Use or Training Problem (1318)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/01/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Device ifu conflicts with manufacturer's instructions and best practices for disinfection.Concern for potential infection transmission in patients.A physician who practices at our healthcare facility has indicated he/she will begin to use the irc 2100 coagulator manufactured by redfield corporation.The manufacturer's website is (b)(6) and is advertised for use in multiple healthcare settings.The irc 2100 is a device that comes into contact with mucous membranes (anus) and would be considered a semi-critical instrument, requiring high level disinfection (hld).The product's instructions for use (ifu) state a number of disinfectants are acceptable to use such as cidex, methracide, etc.All of these are high level disinfectants.However, the ifu further states that the device cannot be washed, soaked or rinsed, and directs the users to wipe clean with the hlds above.In following this ifu, it directly conflicts with manufacturer ifus of disinfectants which work by soaking for a certain amount of time, temperature, etc.This appears to be a recognized problem, and doctor (b)(6) acknowledged this in a study he published in 2012 where he developed a different cleaning method for this device.The redfield 2100 ifus are not consistent with the spaulding scale and are allegedly providing doctor (b)(6) instructions as an alternative method.If this method has indeed been validated, the company should update their ifu manual to reflect this.Because we have no other option available, we are adopting the (b)(6) method/procedure in the interim.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REDFIELD IRC 2100 INFRARED COAGULATOR
Type of Device
UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOPERSURGICAL, INC.
95 corporate drive
trumbull CT 06611
MDR Report Key8726664
MDR Text Key148946757
Report Number8726664
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/21/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/24/2019
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model NumberIRC-HS1
Device Catalogue NumberIRC 2100
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA06/21/2019
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer06/24/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-