The device was not returned for analysis.The reported events are known inherent risk of endovascular procedure and are documented in our device¿s instruction for use (ifu).Based on the reported information, there is no evidence suggesting that the device was defective, but rather a post procedure and patient condition related events.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Medtronic received the following adverse event through literature review of ¿giant vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms in pediatric patients¿ (jiejun wang, yisen zhang, ming lv, xinjian yang, zhongbin tian, jian liu, peng liu, zefeng miao, luqiong jia, junfan chen, xinghuan ding, ying zhang, wei zhu, wenqiang li, kun wang and zhongxiao wang) 54 patients agreed to undergo ped therapy.Of these 54 patients, four were 18 years old or younger at the time of presentation (two males, and two females; mean age 9.25 years; age range 8¿11 years).Case 3: an 8¿10-year-old patient with a mrs of 2 experienced a sudden onset of headaches accompanied by dysphagia 2 months before being admitted to our hospital.Cta performed in another hospital revealed a giant dissecting aneurysm located in the vbj, which was confirmed on dsa performed in our hospital.The lva was treated with two peds (3.5 × 35mm), and the rva underwent parent artery occlusion with coils.Immediately postoperative angiography showed excellent reconstruction of the lva, and complete occlusion of the rva.After the procedure, the clinical symptoms were mildly improved compared with preoperatively.One day post-treatment, mri demonstrated a giant mass effect with an intramural hematoma, resulting in severe brainstem compression.Six months post treatment, follow-up dsa revealed complete occlusion of the lva and rva.Compared with mri performed at 1 day post-treatment, follow-up mri showed a marked reduction in the mass effect.At 6 months after the procedure, the patient had no clinical problems and/or focal neurological function deficiency, with a mrs of 0.As this patient had weak dual posterior communicating arteries preoperatively, the good clinical outcome might be attributed to the presence of robust dual posterior communicating arteries after the procedure.
|