• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG ENNOVATE MIS ROD INSERTER SHORT CONSTR.; INSTRUMENTS POSTERIOR STABILIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG ENNOVATE MIS ROD INSERTER SHORT CONSTR.; INSTRUMENTS POSTERIOR STABILIS Back to Search Results
Model Number SZ384R
Device Problems Material Integrity Problem (2978); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 06/13/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: we made a visual inspection of the fracture surface of the instrument.Here we found solder residues from brazing.Batch history review: the manufacturing documents have ben checked and found to b according to specification valid during the time of production.There are no further complaints with this error pattern at hand.Conclusion and root cause: the root cause for the problem is most probably usage and/or product related.Rationale: the root cause there for the described problem ("rod is jamming in the inserter") cannot be determined, because the rod connector (the interface between instrument and rod) is not available for analysis.The tear off of the rod connector we consider as a secondary damage, cause by mechanical overload during the attempt to decouple the rod.The solder resides at the shaft are a sure hint, that the joint between the torn off connector and the shaft was stable enough for normally forces during usage.The primary problem is there for the sticking rod in the tip of the instrument.Possible root causes for a sticking rod are: deformed/damaged end of the rod.Deformed/damaged interface of the rod connector.Handling error (wrong insertion of the rod in the connector).Measure/shape deviations (unlikely).No capa necessary.
 
Event Description
It was reported the instrument did not release the rod intraoperatively.The reporter indicated that surgery went well.In the end, the rod insertion instrument sz384r could not be detached from the rod.After many attempts to lever up and down, right and left, the instrument simply did not come off.After a last levering attempt the surgeon had the instrument in his hand but the front part was still hanging from the rod (broken off).The surgeon's plan was to possibly remove the entire rod, percutaneously impossible to grasp.After about 1 hour, a doctor had the idea to mill away the bone behind the rod to get more space for removing the broken piece, which was still on the inserted rod.Which finally succeeded.Additional information has been requested, however, as of this report has not yet been received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENNOVATE MIS ROD INSERTER SHORT CONSTR.
Type of Device
INSTRUMENTS POSTERIOR STABILIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
kerstin rothweiler
am aesculap-platz
tuttlingen, baden-wurttemberg 78501
GM   78501
MDR Report Key8772218
MDR Text Key152112341
Report Number9610612-2019-00442
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LXH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/09/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/09/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSZ384R
Device Catalogue NumberSZ384R
Device Lot Number52460080
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/24/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/13/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/11/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-