• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. ARROW - UNKNOWN; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. ARROW - UNKNOWN; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number VASCULAR UNKNOWN
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Tachycardia (2095); Reaction (2414)
Event Date 01/01/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The specific event date, customer facility name/contact information, product code, lot#, patient condition and sample availability are all unknown.No further action is required at this time.If additional information is provided the complaint will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
According to a case report in an article - canadian anesthesiologists society from 2019 for events that occurred in (b)(6): "this (b)(6) male with end-stage renal disease (esrd) secondary to hypertension and type-ii diabetes presented for renal transplantation in 2008.He had been on hemodialysis via an arterio-venous (av) arm fistula for six years.At that initial transplant operation, he received basiliximab pre-treatment followed by induction of anesthesia using midazolam, fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium.Shortly after cvl placement, the patient developed profound hypotension that progressed to a pulseless electrical activity (pea) cardiac arrest with a narrow complex tachycardia and st-segment depression, the operation was cancelled.Allergy skin tests to cefazolin, rocuronium and latex gave negative results as did immunocap testing for latex-specific ige.Basiliximab could not be obtained for skin testing and chx testing was also not performed".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn#(b)(4).Patient codes (cont.) - 1762.The specific event date, customer facility name/contact information, product code, lot#, patient condition and sample availability are all unknown.No further action is required at this time.If additional information is provided the complaint will be updated accordingly.The patient involved with this complaint experienced three different events involving allergic reactions to arrow central catheters.Tc#1900070516, tc#1900070518, and tc#1900070519 were created to address the 3 separate events.For complaints 1900070516 and 1900070518 the customer stated that they were unable to identify the allergy; however, for complaint 1900070519 (the third event), the customer identified an allergy to chx (chlorohexidine), which is a contraindication for arrow gard blue coating (which contains chx).Visual inspection of the sample could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.A device history record review could not be performed as the material# and the lot# was not provided by the customer.The ifu for the finished kit involved with this complaint could not be reviewed as the material and lot numbers were not provided; however, the ifus for coated catheters in general state that, "the arrowg+ard blue antimicrobial catheter is contraindicated for patients with known hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine acetate, silver sulfadiazine, and/or sulfa drugs".The report of a catheter related allergic reaction was confirmed through the customer description of the events that occurred for complaints tc#1900070516, tc#1900070518, and tc#1900070519.The customer stated that a chlorohexidine coated catheter was used in each of these events.Additionally, it was confirmed that the patient suffered from an allergic reaction to chlorohexidine in tc#1900070519.Based on the information provided by the customer in tc#1900070519 and the confirmation that a coated catheter was used, unintentional user error (patient condition) caused or contributed to this event.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
 
Event Description
According to a case report in an article - canadian anesthesiologists society from 2019 for events that occurred in toronto, canada: "this 63-year-old male with end-stage renal disease (esrd) secondary to hypertension and type-ii diabetes presented for renal transplantation in 2008.He had been on hemodialysis via an arterio-venous (av) arm fistula for six years.At that initial transplant operation, he received basiliximab pre-treatment followed by induction of anesthesia using midazolam, fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium.Shortly after cvl placement, the patient developed profound hypotension that progressed to a pulseless electrical activity (pea) cardiac arrest with a narrow complex tachycardia and st-segment depression, the operation was cancelled.Allergy skin tests to cefazolin, rocuronium and latex gave negative results as did immunocap testing for latex-specific ige.Basiliximab could not be obtained for skin testing and chx testing was also not performed".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARROW - UNKNOWN
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
reading PA
MDR Report Key8799327
MDR Text Key151334495
Report Number9680794-2019-00275
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/11/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/17/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberVASCULAR UNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/24/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
-
-