A clinician questioned repeat (b)(6) architect anti-hcv results generated for a (b)(6) year old male dailysis patient on (b)(6) 2019 and (b)(6) 2019.Based on the (b)(6) results, the clinician assigned the patient to the (b)(6) patient group and performed dialysis.Elisa anti-hcv and (b)(6) rna testing was (b)(6), so the clinician suspected the architect results to be (b)(6).The patient was tested again on (b)(6) 2019 and the anti-hcv result was (b)(6).The patient was exposed to (b)(6) dialysis equipment.No post-dialysis (b)(6) testing was provided.Since it is unknown when the last exposure to the (b)(6) dialysis equipment was, it cannot be ruled out that an adverse event / serious injury may have occurred.
|