|
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.A review of the complaint history for the cup and head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified for the cup and head.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.Device history record review confirmed that all released parts met specifications applicable at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event and no further actions are required at this time.The medical records were reviewed.The retroverted acetabular cup cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor to the patient¿s pain and clinical status.Although the reported pain, dark fluid and synovitis may be consistent with metallosis; the root cause of the metallosis cannot be confirmed, and it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|
