• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANATOMAGE INC. ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANATOMAGE INC. ANATOMAGE GUIDE; SURGICAL GUIDE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 06/03/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that there were discrepancies in the materials provided by the doctor that could have led to a fit issue and subsequent trajectory issues.The intra-oral patient scan was missing an area of deep soft tissue on the buccal side of areas #3 - #6.This area should have prompted addition of heavy block-out either virtually or physically to correct the gap, but the software technician only indicated that "slight" block-out should be added during lab fabrication.Although the instruction was not appropriate to address the discrepancy, the affected area was ultimately trimmed during fabrication and not included in the guide.Therefore, the issue likely did not affect the fit of the guide.The patient scan quality submitted by the doctor was suboptimal and could have contributed to the fit issue.There was limited soft tissue separation throughout the scan, heavy shine in the posterior areas which obscured the shapes of teeth #4, 7, and 12-15, and the scan was taken with a closed bite which further obscured the shapes of the teeth.However, these factors alone did not necessitate a request for new materials as the registration was acceptable per procedural guidelines.The guide passed its quality analysis prior to shipment, confirming that the trajectories aligned with the dental model.The returned guide was determined to seat well on the dental model with stable sleeves.The trajectory analysis determined that the trajectory aligned well with the treatment plan and the deviation was within the standard tolerance of <0.5 mm.The doctor had planned and approved the treatment plan prior to fabrication.Therefore, the potential cause of the fit issue is likely inaccurate tooth anatomy in the intra-oral scan which would have been difficult to detect due to the aforementioned patient scan quality observations.As the guide did not fit properly, the planned trajectories likely deviated thus causing the adverse event.Doctors are advised to not use the guide for surgery if it does not seat properly in the patient's mouth.
 
Event Description
The doctor attempted to seat the guide, but found that it did not fit properly and rocked.The doctor decided to use the guide by pushing down on different areas to drill and placed the site 6 implant.The doctor observed that the placement looked more buccal than planned.The patient later complained of pain 1 week later and the doctor removed the implant and grafted the site.The guide was created for sites 3 and 6 but was only used to place the site 6 implant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANATOMAGE GUIDE
Type of Device
SURGICAL GUIDE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANATOMAGE INC.
303 almaden blvd.
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANATOMAGE INC.
303 almaden blvd.
suite 700
san jose CA 95110
Manufacturer Contact
meera kler
303 almaden blvd.
suite 700
san jose, CA 95110
MDR Report Key8844198
MDR Text Key152760473
Report Number3008272529-2019-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/03/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/30/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/19/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/03/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/31/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
-
-