• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Visual Impairment (2138); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown plates: trauma/unknown lot number.Without the specific part number, the udi number and 510k number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(4).Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.Investigation summary product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Device report from korea, south reports an event as follows:this report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: kyu jin chung et, al (2016), correction of medial blowout fractures according to the fracture types, annals of plastic surgery vol.76 no.1, pages 46-50 (korea, south).Doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000560.The aim of this study is to classify the types of medial orbital wall fractures and to suggest appropriate guidelines for the selection of an appropriate technique for each category.Between 2010 and march 2013, a total of 89 patients (67 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 36.1 years (range, 11-71 years) were included in the study.These patients were classified into 3 different categories: greenstick, simple, and complex.In simple fractures type ii, the defects were reconstructed by applying for a 0.8-mm-thin titanium-reinforced fan plate.For complex fracture, the 3-mm-thick porous polyethylene plate was inserted into the fractured site.The mean duration of follow-up was 7.4 months.The following complications were reported as follows: 2 patients had diplopia and limitation of eyeball movement in type ii patients.2 diplopia and 1 eyeball movement limitation postoperatively in type iii patients.1 patient in type i, suffered 2 mm enophthalmos 3 months after the operation.2 patients in type iii, complained of residual presence of enophthalmos after the operation.The 2 patients had 2 mm enophthalmos without discomfort in cosmetic outcomes.Of the 3 pieces of implant that had been inserted, one was removed resulting in resolution of the eyeball movement limitation (table 1).This report is 3 of 4 for (b)(4).This report is for a 0.8-mm-thin titanium-reinforced fan plate and 3-mm-thick porous polyethylene plate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OBERDORF SYNTHES PRODUKTIONS GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ   4436
6103142063
MDR Report Key8890985
MDR Text Key154727198
Report Number8030965-2019-67198
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/17/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/13/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/17/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-