• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO PROTACK; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO PROTACK; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Model Number 174006
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Positioning Failure (1158); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/29/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the tacker did not fire and got jammed.Additionally, the fired tacks did not hold correctly onto the tissue and fell into the patient's cavity.However, it was retrieved.The surgeon used another tacker to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of one device.Visual inspection of the product noted the timing was disengaged.Additionally, the trigger was jammed.Functionally, the trigger of the instrument was actuated after disassembling the body from the tube.Tacks were jammed in the tube and did not deploy due to the timing disruption.Records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.Replication of the reported condition is caused by an instrument that has been exposed to excessive force while applying helixes to a surface.If a helix is fired over improper surfaces it can provoke the exertion of excessive force to the handle causing the unit to disrupt the timing and to a possible jam.The root cause of the observed damage was found to be due to the device not being used as intended which caused or contributed to the reported condition.No further actions have been deemed necessary at this time.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, while the tacker is firing, tacks disengaged one by one.Tacks does not fixate and device got jammed.In addition, the fired tacks did not hold correctly onto the tissue and fell into the patient's cavity.However, it was retrieved by used of another device.The surgeon used another tacker to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTACK
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer (Section G)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer Contact
lisa hernandez
60 middletown ave.
north haven, CT 06473
2034925563
MDR Report Key8907501
MDR Text Key154775812
Report Number2647580-2019-04192
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier20884521070407
UDI-Public20884521070407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K090470
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/19/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/19/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2021
Device Model Number174006
Device Catalogue Number174006
Device Lot NumberP6D0174X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/09/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/27/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age55 YR
Patient Weight69
-
-