Product complaint # (b)(4).
Citing: the norwegian hip fracture register experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations" by jan-erik gjertsen, lars b engesæter, ove furnes, leif ivar havelin, kjersti steindal, tarjei vinje, and jonas m fevang published online july 20, 2008 by acta orthopaedica 2008; 79 (5): 583¿593.
(b)(4).
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Literature article entitled "the norwegian hip fracture register experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations" by jan-erik gjertsen, lars b engesæter, ove furnes, leif ivar havelin, kjersti steindal, tarjei vinje, and jonas m fevang published online july 20, 2008 by acta orthopaedica 2008; 79 (5): 583¿593 was reviewed for mdr reportability.
"the norwegian hip fracture register was established in january 2005 to collect nationwide information as a basis for improved management of patients with hip fractures.
The main aims of the hip fracture register are to collect epidemiological data, to evaluate the results of different treatment methods for the different types of hip fractures in various patient populations, and to identify inferior methods early on.
The register also provides data on incidence of fracture types, treatment methods, and trends over time.
Finally, hospital-specific results are reported back to the participating hospitals to facilitate improvement in treatment.
This article is a report of the experience after the first 2 years.
The information is comprised of 13,251 hips from 55 different hospitals and reports 2,325 hips received revision.
Initial operations addressed various types of fractures and utilized various surgical procedures including fixations and hemiarthroplasty.
The article reports of 4,669 screws or pins olmed (depuy) consisted of 2,710; out of 2,783 hemiarthroplasties depuy charnley(cemented), corail (uncemented) and titan (cemented) stems consisted of 1,571 - all were all noted as bipolar components.
Reasons for revisions but unspecified to which products (both depuy and non depuy): sequelae of femoral neck fracture, osteosynthesis failure, nonunion, local pain due to osteosynthesis material through caput, dislocated hemiprosthesis, hematoma, superficial wound infection, fracture healed in wrong positon, sequelae of proximal femoral fracture (except femoral neck fracture) loosening of hemiarthroplasty, pain after hemiarthroplasty, other reasons and unknown.
The total reasons were 2,619 indicating some of the 2,325 revisions entailed multiple reasonings.
|