Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.
Reporter is a synthes legal professional.
Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.
Product was not returned.
Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.
This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.
If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.
(b)(4).
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2019, the patient underwent removal of an intramedullary nail and screw fixator because of increasing pain with feelings of leg shortening as well as a broken left intertrochanteric femoral nail.
The portion of the trochanteric fixation nail (tfna) was removed as well as the proximal screw.
The distal screw was backed up to allow for passing of the extraction hook once this has been passed to.
The nail was removed and then the distal portion of the nail was removed without issue.
Once this had been accomplished and arthrotomy was made as well as removal of heterotropic ossification around the greater trochanter to facilitate removal of the next segment once the neck segment had been removed.
Another stem was implanted in the patient.
On or about (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent intramedullary nail fixation of the left intertrochanteric femur fracture with closed reduction and casting of left distal radius fracture.
Patient presented with a left intertrochanteric femur fracture with left multisegmental distal radius fracture.
This report is for a tfna screw 85mm - sterile.
This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|