The reason for this revision surgery was reported as fracture.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 9.4 years apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) was not conducted since the item or lot number was not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to a fracture.The length of in-vivo service is unknown since an original surgery date was not provided or could be established.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.Should addition information become available this complaint shall be re-opened and a further evaluation well be conducted.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|