• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ONKOS SURGICAL ELEOS TIBIAL POLY SPACER; PROSTHESIS, KNEE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ONKOS SURGICAL ELEOS TIBIAL POLY SPACER; PROSTHESIS, KNEE Back to Search Results
Model Number 25001212E
Device Problem Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); No Information (3190)
Event Date 08/08/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for one of two devices involved in this event, please refer to report 3013450937-2019-00048.The device history record and sterilization batch release record were reviewed and indicated that the component met specification.The tibial poly spacer was returned for further analysis and this report will be supplemented when further information is made available.
 
Event Description
Patient x-rays revealed that the post of the tibial hinge component had fractured and required surgical intervention.During the revision surgery, the tibial poly spacer was identified as being damaged and was revised.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for one of two devices involved in this event, please refer to report 3013450937-2019-00048.The device history record and sterilization batch release record were reviewed and indicated that the component met specification.The tibial poly spacer was returned extremely damaged and the fractured tibial hinge component stem was lodged within the tibial poly spacer stem.The tibial poly spacer stem was deformed approximately an inch from the upper edge, posteriorly to anteriorly.The deformation shows that the upper part of the tibial poly spacer stem and hinge stem were not within the tibial baseplate during this failure.Additionally, the lateral side of the face of the tibial poly spacer was deformed indicating that the patient's knee was not tracking evenly on the spacer.A dimensional analysis was unable to be performed on the tibial poly spacer due to the amount of deformation.The tibial poly spacer becoming deformed could have been a result of the tibial hinge component fracturing.Ultimately, the root cause of the complaint was unable to be determined, but based upon the device history record, sterilization record, returned component, and patient history it was concluded that the malfunction could not be attributed to the manufacturing of the eleos component or a nonconformance.
 
Event Description
Patient presented with knee pain and x-rays revealed that the post of the tibial hinge component had fractured and required surgical intervention.During the revision surgery, the tibial poly spacer was identified as being damaged and was revised.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELEOS TIBIAL POLY SPACER
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ONKOS SURGICAL
77 east halsey road
parsippany NJ 07054
MDR Report Key9072571
MDR Text Key160615391
Report Number3013450937-2019-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
UDI-Device IdentifierB27825001212E0
UDI-PublicB27825001212E0
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K161520
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/21/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number25001212E
Device Catalogue Number25001212E
Device Lot Number1699710
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/09/2019
Date Manufacturer Received10/10/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-