The catheter was returned to numed for review.
A longitudinal tear was confirmed in the balloon.
The cause of the balloon burst could not be identified through microscopic inspection.
The device history records were reviewed and no issues were identified.
All devices that were distributed met the criteria for release and passed all inspection processes and procedures.
There have no other complaints with this catheter lot.
A review of the balloon tubing used to manufacture this device was also performed.
There were no other associated complaints with this lot of balloon tubing.
Tyshak ii catheters are leak tested in final qc at labeled rated burst pressure.
A comparative device was pulled and tested for rated burst pressure.
This device was the same catalog number as the complaint device, but a different lot number.
The balloon was immersed in a body temperature water bath and inflated in 0.
5 atm increments until failure.
The balloon burst at 4.
0 atm, which is double the labeled rated burst pressure of 2.
0 atm.
It was a longitudinal burst.
According to the report from the hospital, the device was being used off label for an unapproved indication; aortic valvuloplasty.
This catheter is only indicated for pulmonary valvuloplasty.
The report from the hospital also states that the physician believed the rupture to be caused by the heavy calcium on the patient's valve which poked a hole in the balloon.
The patient coded during the procedure and did not survive.
Physician stated that the patient did not code as a result of the rupture.
It is unknown if an inflation device with pressure gauge was used to monitor the inflation pressure during the procedure as specified in the instructions for use.
|