There were no such cases reported or known to the manufacturer in the past.Per the patient, she was using the days device daily since she purchased days in (b)(6) 2019.Most likely, there was no contamination from production or transportation, since candida is present in the mouth of humans.The patient stated that she was not cleaning the device between use (the ifu states that it should be cleaned).The user provided photos showing there was no physical damage to the device specifically the tip of the sensor being in contact with the mucus.Hence, the device most likely did not cause micro lesions due to sharp edges.Also, there were no dirt particles visible in the pictures.Furthermore, the patient stated to have discomfort while using the device before the adverse event.After request she confirmed to have overinserted the device (ifu warns not to overinsert the device) and suspects this to be the root cause for the oral thrush.To this point it is unclear whether or not untreated candidiasis may lead to systemic candidiasis potentially putting the patient into a situation of serious injury meaning permanent damage to a body function or part.Our report is past the 30 day reporting mark due delays in getting a functioning production account for the esubmitter/web trader.
|