Manufacturing side evaluation: we received a complaint about a broken off tip of a pair of scissors.The broken pair of scissors is available for investigation decontaminated, but not the broken off tip.According to the available information, there were no negative consequences for the patient.Investigation: the pair of scissors is in a bad condition, the tip of the lower shear blade is broken off.Vigilance investigator carried out the pictorial documentation visually1 and microscopically2.The tip of the lower shear blade is broken off, the fragment is not available.The biseaus of the blades are grinded improperly several bevels can be found.This indicates a third party maintenance.Furthermore, no ats stamp can be found on the surface of the provided pair of scissors.At the joint area of the lower shear blade a crack can be found.A cutting test according to the qstd was carried out, but failed due to the poor blade geometry.At the back of the lower shear blades pitting corrosion is recognizable.Batch history review: the traceability of articles without batch management requirement is guaranteed by the production order number, which can be traced over the production period and the corresponding customer (backtrack).In addition, the raw materials, semi-finished parts, etc.Used for the order are documented in the manufacturing history records (dhr - device history records).This ensures the traceability of the internal supply and production chain.Internal traceability is thus guaranteed.Conclusion and root cause: based on the information available as well as a result of our investigation the root cause of the failure is most probably related to a third party maintenance of the device.Rationale: the root cause of the failure was most likely caused by an overload situation e.G.Leverage or torsion due to the poor blade geometry caused by the third party maintenance.Corrective action: according to sop sa-de13-m-4-2-04-000-0 (corrective action and preventive action), a capa is not necessary.
|