This is one of three manufacturer reports being submitted for this case.Per the instructions for use (ifu), coronary flow obstruction is a potential adverse event associated with the tavr procedure.The ifu cautions that the safety and effectiveness have not been established for patients with bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia.Coronary occlusion can result in myocardial ischemia or infarction due to obstruction of the coronary blood flow and may require intervention (e.G.Pci). the edwards thv training manuals advise the operator on pre-procedure assessment of the aortic valve, root, and coronary anatomy.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the transcatheter heart valve (thv) in on-label procedures.Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure-specific training manuals and proctored procedures.The physician is instructed to evaluate this risk early in the patient screening process in all patients.The following factors should be considered: degree of calcification on leaflets, annulus to coronary ostia distance, length of the valve leaflet, width of the valsalva sinuses, movement of the leaflets during bav, patency of coronaries during bav, and expanded height of the intended thv.The edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve and accessories are indicated for relief of aortic stenosis in patients with symptomatic heart disease due to severe native calcific aortic stenosis, or failure (stenosed, insufficient, or combined) of a surgical bioprosthetic aortic or mitral valve, who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at low or greater risk for open surgical therapy (i.E., predicted risk of surgical mortality = 1% at 30 days, based on the society of thoracic surgeons (sts) risk score and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the sts risk calculator). the use of a sapien 3 valve in a pulmonic thv in the aortic position is not indicated per the labeling; therefore, the device instructions for use and procedural training manual do not provide direction for the use of the device in this application.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Per a review of the article, the root cause may have been a narrowing of the coronary ostia by one of the valve anchoring sutures.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case. the reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.Sinha, sanjay, et al."application of transcatheter valves for aortic valve replacement in pediatric patients: a case series." catheterization and cardiovascular interventions (2019).
|