• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTACT VASCULAR, INC. TACK ENDOVASCULAR SYSTEM® (6F); SCAFFOLD, DISSECTION REPAIR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTACT VASCULAR, INC. TACK ENDOVASCULAR SYSTEM® (6F); SCAFFOLD, DISSECTION REPAIR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 156120061
Device Problem Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problem Discomfort (2330)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device cannot be returned to the manufacturer because it is permanently implanted in the patient.Intact vascular has attempted to contact the reporter of this event for additional information but the request for additional information was not received.If additional information is received after this report, a supplemental report will be submitted.From the information received to date, it appears that displacement of the implant occurred due to user error.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent an endovascular procedure around the end of (b)(6) 2019.The tack endovascular system (6f) was used to treat the post-pta dissections observed.Treatment of observed dissections was considered successful at the end of the procedure.This initial intervention was performed by dr.Ehrin armstrong at rocky mountain regional va medical center.One week after the initial endovascular procedure, the patient underwent further treatment unrelated to the use of tack endovascular system.This involved another endovascular procedure where pedal access was used.The physician who performed this second procedure was dr.Javier valle at rocky mountain regional va medical center.The pedal access involved advancing an 0.018" wire and quickcross catheter through the tack implants that were placed a week prior.The crossing of deployed tack implants was done to gain access to the superficial femoral artery (sfa) for further treatment.During the process of crossing the tack implants, the physician displaced the most proximal tack implant against another stent that was placed prior to the second intervention.The resultant displacement of the tack implant was described by the physician (dr.Valle) to cause reduced blood flow.The physician ultimately resolved the issue of reduced blood flow by placing a viabahn stent which covered the displaced tack implant.The final result was considered good and the last known patient condition post-procedure was considered good.This incident is being reported since the previously implanted tack was displaced by the end user (physician) during a secondary intervention that was independent of the tack implant placement.This report is being submitted out of excess caution as the manufacturer has determined that the use of a stent as bailout to treat the reduced bloodflow caused added procedural delay to the medical intervention underway.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TACK ENDOVASCULAR SYSTEM® (6F)
Type of Device
SCAFFOLD, DISSECTION REPAIR
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTACT VASCULAR, INC.
1285 drummers lane, suite 200
wayne PA 19087
Manufacturer Contact
joseph griffin, iii
1285 drummers lane, suite 200
wayne, PA 19087
4842531048
MDR Report Key9321585
MDR Text Key168056142
Report Number3012608866-2019-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QCT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P180034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/14/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/14/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number156120061
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/16/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-