• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1200 SYNCHRONY
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and has been returned to innsbruck where it will be evaluated.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow-up report.
 
Event Description
The implant was activated in (b)(6) 2018 and at the beginning the user had very good hearing performance.In (b)(6) 2019 the user reported a little pain at the implant site and had her magnet changed from #4 to #3.The user came back in (b)(6) 2019 and was hospitalized because of terrible pain at the implant side.Use of audio processor was stopped and a therapy with antibiotics and cortisone was started.Even after two weeks the pain did not subside.The recipient suffered even when the coil was near the skin but not in touch with it and when the implant site was touched with the hand.The device was explanted in (b)(6) 2019.At explantation the device was wrapped in a biofilm.The electrode array was left implanted for re-implantation at a later date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigation did not reveal any device defect or damage which has been present whilst implanted.According to the information received, the recipient experienced delayed pressure pain at the implant site, which was perceptible even when the external magnet and processor were not used and did not subside with conservative treatment.No signs of infection or inflammation have been reported.At explantation, a biofilm was suspected, however it was not confirmed.A review of the device_s sterilization records shows that the device has been subject to a valid sterilization process.Damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.This is a final report.
 
Event Description
The implant was activated in (b)(6) 2018 and at the beginning the user had very good hearing performance.In may 2019 the user reported a little pain at the implant site and had her magnet changed from #4 to #3.The user came back in (b)(6) 2019 and was hospitalized because of terrible pain at the implant side.Use of audio processor was stopped and a therapy with antibiotics and cortisone was started.Even after two weeks the pain did not subside.The recipient suffered even when the coil was near the skin but not in touch with it and when the implant site was touched with the hand.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
MDR Report Key9327709
MDR Text Key166581232
Report Number9710014-2019-00882
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737094003
UDI-Public(01)09008737094003
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/06/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/15/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMI1200 SYNCHRONY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/30/2019
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age20 YR
-
-