Exemption number (b)(4).
The device was not returned for analysis.
A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.
Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other complaints.
The reported patient effect of vessel injury, e.
G.
Dissection, perforation is listed in the armada 35 instructions for use as a complication which may occur as a result of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.
Based on the information provided, the balloon rupture appears to be due to case circumstances.
There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|