Model Number SN6AT4 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Zonular Dehiscence (2698)
|
Event Date 10/28/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product was not returned for analysis.Product history and batch records were reviewed and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The product investigation could not identify a root cause.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A physician reported that following an intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, the patient reported dysphotopsia.The case went perfectly and her vision is excellent.The physician asked the patient to wait a few weeks to see if the condition would subside, but it did not.The physician sent the patient for a second opinion and that physician exchanged the iol for a different manufacturer's iol.Additional information was provided by the original physician that the patient experienced significant positive and negative dysphotopsia starting the day after the initial procedure.Additional information was provided by the patient that the original physician told her she had weak zonules.The patient also reported that the second physician did not say she had weak zonules.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was provided by a certified ophthalmic assistant, who reported that the patient's issues have resolved.The prognosis is excellent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided in description of event or problem, test/laboratory data, other relevant history, initial reporter also sent reports to fda, device evaluated by mfr, adverse event problem, and additional narrative.Evaluation summary: the device was received by a company representative and is in transit to the manufacturing site for investigation.Investigation including root cause analysis will be completed.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided in d.10., h.3., h.6., and h.10.Product evaluation: the iol was returned for analysis and the reported complaint could not be confirmed.Additional observations were as follows: iol was returned cut in half in a specimen container.The segments are adhered to each other with solution.Solution is dried on both surfaces of the optic and haptics.The optic is torn/split-cut dividing the iol in two(2) and scratched/marked-rejectable.Optical power & resolution could not be verified due to the extensive optic damage.The root cause for the reported complaint could not be determined.An impact to the visual acuity of the patient cannot be verified by examination of the returned product.Based on these investigation findings, we are unable to verify if the iol contributed to the event.All product and batch history records are quality reviewed prior to product release.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Further information was provided by the original physician that the patient had positive and negative dysphotopsias.The clinical reason for explantation was "unbearable", and "unable to drive at night".Symptoms resolved after iol exchange.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information provided in b.5.And e.1.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|