The investigation determined that discordant, (b)(6) vitros ahcv results were obtained from two samples from the same patient when tested on a vitros 5600 integrated system.The results were discordant compared to (b)(6) results obtained from non-vitros methods.A definitive assignable cause of the event was not established.A sample interferent that affects the vitros ahcv reagent assay cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event, as no testing to rule out the presence of a sample interferent was conducted.A vitros ahcv lot 4511 reagent issue is an unlikely contributor to the event, as historical vitros ahcv results were within acceptable guidelines.Additionally, ongoing tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros ahcv reagent lot 4511.An instrument issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event, as no precision testing was conducted on the vitros 5600 integrated system to verify its performance.In addition, pre-analytical sample processing could not be ruled out as a contributing factor as the customer is not following the sample collection device manufacture¿s recommendation for sample centrifugation.Improper pre-analytical sample handling could have contributed to this event.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected sample, although this could not be confirmed.
|