• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25 HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25 HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX414T
Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Patient Problems Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688); Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 06/27/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Height: 150cm. Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection. Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the progav 2. 0 valve is permeable. Adjustment test: the progav 2. 0 valve was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures. Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances. Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over/under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus, which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow. The progav 2. 0 valve is not operating within acceptable tolerances. Result: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav 2. 0 valve. No significant deformations or damage of the valve were detected during the visual inspection. Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, and opening pressure of the valve, as well as the brake functionality and brake force. The progav 2. 0 valve operates as expected and met all specifications. The opening pressure of the progav 2. 0 was significantly lower than expected, indicating a tendency towards over-drainage. Finally, we have dismantled the valve. Inside the valve, we have found a build-up of substances (likely protein). Based on our investigation, we confirm that the progav 2. 0 valve was operating in an over-drainage state at the time of our investigation. This is likely due to the deposits observed inside the valves. As described in our literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants. We can exclude a defect at the time of release. The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co. Kg.
 
Event Description
It was reported there was a valve defect. The reporter indicated that a post operative valve over and /under drains. The device required explantation. Additional details of the event have not been provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand NamePROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25
Type of DeviceHYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM 14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO. KG
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM 14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
2 ulanenweg
potsdam d, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key9392011
MDR Text Key168783570
Report Number3004721439-2019-00280
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeDA
PMA/PMN Number
K161853
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/29/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/29/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator
Device Model NumberFX414T
Device Catalogue NumberFX414T
Device Lot Number20040622
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/07/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA?
Event Location No Information
Date Manufacturer Received08/28/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage

Patient Treatment Data
Date Received: 11/29/2019 Patient Sequence Number: 1
-
-