• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX15; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA CAPIOX FX15; OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CX-FX15RW40V
Device Problem Increase in Pressure (1491)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/15/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi - not required for product code.Implanted date: device was not implanted.Explanted date: device was not explanted.Pma/510(k)- k130520.The actual sample was received for evaluation.Visual inspection revealed that red clots and white clots had formed.Blood observed on the back and bottom sides of the oxygenator was conceivable to be the result that the blood cell components that had been accumulated between the housing and the fiber of the oxygenator became precipitated during the return shipment to (b)(6).An attempt was made to irrigate the blood channel with saline solution by gravity drop, however, the flow rate of over 0.1ml/min could not be obtained.Based on this, it is presumed that the actual device had been clogged.The inside of the oxygenation module was fixed by being filled with glutaraldehyde-containing saline solution.Then, the housing and the filter were removed and subjected to visual inspection.Formation of blood clots were found on the outer and inner surfaces of the filter.No clots were found to have formed inside the housing.The oxygenation module was visually inspected, and some blood clots were found to have formed.The state of the fiber winding was confirmed to be normal.The fiber layers were removed from the winding in increments of 2mm and each layer was subjected to visual inspection.Blood clots were found to have formed in all layer.The outer cylinder was removed from the heat exchanger module and the inside of the heat exchanger module was subjected to visual and magnifying inspections.Red clots were found to have formed.The filter that had been removed was inspected under magnification.Red and white clots were found to have formed on both the outer and the inner surfaces.The fiber layers removed during the test were inspected under magnification.Red and white clots were found to have formed.Electron microscopic inspection of the filter found the aggregations of platelets, adhesion of blood cell components such as deformed red blood cells (echinocyte), and formation of fibrin nets on both the outer and the inner surfaces of the filter.Electron microscopic inspection of the fiber layers found the aggregations of platelets, adhesion of blood cell components such as red blood cells, deformed red blood cells (echinocyte), and formation of fibrin nets on all layer.Electron microscopic inspection of the white clot formed on the upper side of the oxygenator found the aggregations of platelets, fibrin nets, and adhesion of blood cell components such as deformed red blood cells (echinocyte).The clots adhering to the heat exchanger module was collected and inspected under electron microscope.The blood cell components such as red blood cells were observed.A review of the device history record and product release decision control sheet of the involved product code/lot number combination was conducted with no findings.Ifu states: adequate heparinization of the blood is required to prevent it from clotting in the system.Do not reduce heparin during circulation.Otherwise, blood clotting might occur.Based on the provided information and investigation results, there is no definitive evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.It is likely that the clots were formed due to some factors and caused the pressure inside the oxygenator to increase; however, from the available information, it is difficult to determine the factors that caused the formation of clots.However, the exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The user facility reported that the involved capiox device was used during a taa case.After ten minutes from the start of cpb, the pressure inside the oxygenator was found to have increased from 200mmhg to 450mmhg.When the rectal temperature was decreased from 35°c to 20°c, the pressure inside the oxygenator did not change and some white substances appeared inside (upper part) of the oxygenator.Afterward, from when rewarming started, the pressure decreased gradually.There was no change out of the oxygenator.There was no harm to the patient.The procedure outcome was not reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPIOX FX15
Type of Device
OXYGENATOR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA  418
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
reg. no. 9681834
150 maimaigi-cho
fujinomiya city, 418
JA   418
Manufacturer Contact
theresa mussaw
reg. no. 2243441
950 elkton blvd.
elkton, MD 21921
MDR Report Key9409722
MDR Text Key204009898
Report Number9681834-2019-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeID
PMA/PMN Number
K071494
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/04/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/04/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2022
Device Catalogue NumberCX-FX15RW40V
Device Lot Number190823
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/19/2019
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/15/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-