The investigation has determined that discordant, higher than expected vitros tsh results were obtained from multiple patient samples using vitros immunodiagnostics products tsh reagent lot 6000 tested on a vitros 5600 integrated system.The results were discordant when compared to results obtained from a non-vitros abbott system.A definitive assignable cause for the higher than expected vitros tsh results could not be determined.However, it is likely that a combination of insufficient instrument maintenance, pre-analytical sample handling and the failure to follow instructions in regards to using within-date reagents contributed to the event.The customer had not run vitros maintenance packs when scheduled, as em (expired maintenance) test codes posted for all vitros tsh results between 19 october 2019 and 11 november 2019.In addition, re (reagent expired) test codes were posted during the testing of two of the patient samples indicating an expired reagent was in use on the vitros 5600 integrated system.Additionally, pre-analytical sample handling cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event as the ortho technical solutions center indicated that the discordant, higher than expected vitros tsh results were obtained more than 7 days after sample collection.The vitros tsh instructions for use (ifu) states: ¿serum and plasma samples may be stored for up to 7 days at 2¿8 °c or 4 weeks at -20 °c¿.There was no indication that any of the patient samples had been frozen.A reagent issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event as no historical quality control results were available to verify the performance of the vitros tsh lot 6000 reagent.However, ongoing tracking and trending of complaints has not identified any signals that would indicate a potential systematic issue with vitros tsh reagent lot 6000.The performance of the vitros 5600 integrated system was not verified around the time of the event and cannot be ruled out as a contributing factor of the event.No precision testing was conducted on the instrument, however, cleaning actions appeared to have resolved the issue.No specific details of the cleaning actions performed were provided by the customer.
|