• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3® Ø11X200MM X 130°; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3® Ø11X200MM X 130°; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number 3130-1200S
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Injury (2348)
Event Date 11/20/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon completion of investigation, additional information will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
The gamma3 nail broke and was replaced by an artificial hip joint in (b)(6) 2019.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed.Device inspection revealed the following: the received nail was found completely broken in the web.The evaluation of the broken surface revealed that the breakage originated from the anterior web.Significant step drill marks are visible around the inside surface of the anterior web as well.Visibility of lines of rest confirmed the breakage to be a fatigue fracture.The posterior web was chipped off rather quickly due to increased tension.Plastic deformation was found around the edge of anterior web due to rubbing of lag screw against it, post-breakage.There were abrupt ridges and other scratch marks which were caused during ex-plantation.Based on the investigation it was observed that the reason for breakage was fatigue stress.This was induced due to the damage done during the drilling for lag screw by a step-drill.Subsequently, the area around the damage, got weakened (reduction in fatigue strength) and over a period of time (10-11 months) the affected web of the nail broke in a fatigue manner.Since the patient is also being revised to an artificial hip joint, there is a possibility of a potential delayed healing, which could have also contributed in the failure, but due to unavailability any post op x-ray, it cannot be ascertained.Thus, based on the investigation the predominantly the failure happened due to a user related issue.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
 
Event Description
The gamma3 nail broke and was replaced by an artificial hip joint in (b)(6) 2019.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TROCHANTERIC NAIL KIT, TI GAMMA3® Ø11X200MM X 130°
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
DE  D-24232
MDR Report Key9507539
MDR Text Key178378629
Report Number0009610622-2019-00975
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device Identifier04546540375131
UDI-Public04546540375131
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K034002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/26/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date08/31/2023
Device Model Number3130-1200S
Device Catalogue Number31301200S
Device Lot NumberK02D397
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/30/2019
Date Manufacturer Received01/30/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age86 YR
Patient Weight62
-
-