Additional information provided in d.10., g.1., g.2., h.3., h.6., and h.10.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.The used returned sample was visually inspected and no obvious defects were found.A console representing the current software version was used to test the sample.The ball in the drip chamber¿s check valve moved freely per specification.The sample could prime and tune with the ultrasonic handpiece successfully.The irrigation and aspiration pressure were measured at multiple set points and met specifications.No message code appeared on the screen.Fluid flowed from balanced salt solution (bss) to the drain bag without any interfering.No leakage was detected from the pump elastomer or on the pump area of the fluidics module.Cleaning process was able to be performed after functional test was completed.The sample passed functionality and performance testing.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established; the returned sample met specifications.After investigation of this complaint, it has been determined that this sample met specifications; therefore, no corrective action is required at this time.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|