The associated devices, used in treatment, were returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned devices confirmed the stated failure mode.The tip of the drill was heavily damaged and some small pieces fractured off the tip.The fractured pieces were not returned.The guide pins were heavily worn and bent with score marks on the shafts.The devices were manufactured in 2014, 2018 and 2019 and show signs of extensive wear / usage.The medical investigation concluded that, based on the results of the product evaluation, the root cause of the reported tip breakage is likely due to ¿extensive wear / usage¿ factor along with the interference with the guide pin.The 465 stainless steel is not an implantable alloy; therefore, long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible micro-motion and/or migration, local irritation/discomfort, and probable mri restrictions cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batches.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|