H10: h2, h6.One 72202893 twinfix ultra ti 4.5mm suture anchor device used for treatment, was returned for evaluation.There was discoloration at the laser marking area of the distal tip.There was no anchor or suture returned.Initial evaluation was unconfirmed.Complaint history review indicated similar allegations for the lot number reported.Batch review did not indicate a condition or product/procedure failure that supported the allegation.The device appears to have reddish/brown discoloration isolated only to the laser marking along the shaft.The discoloration appears to be corrosion but this was not confirmed.A review of information for p/n 72202893 lot: 2029381 shows that this product was assembled in costa rica and the shaft component (p/n 90504293) built into the upper level assembly consisted of three lots with manufacture dates of 22 feb 2018, 09 jan 2019 and 07 jan 2019.A review of ncmrs show no ncmrs for these lots.A review of deviations shows one deviation that coincides with one of the shaft manufacturing lots; 2018-12.This deviation allowed the use of an ultrasonic cleaning operation while the branson degreaser was being validated.The ultrasonic cleaning method was the original method of cleaning these parts until the pero degreaser was validated.Because of similar complaints that showed no deviation from the process having a similar discrepancy, this is not likely the cause to this failure mode.A review of relevant clinical/medical information in the reported issue, inclusive of technique and patient information, to include, but not limited to: ¿patient information ¿surgical procedure/post-operative care review ¿device labeling (including technique guides, ifus, etc.) reportedly while using twin fix ultra pack anchor, the metal inserter was found to have rust following arthroscopic view.One intraoperative photo was provided for review and confirm a color variation.The device was returned for evaluation and a reddish/brown discoloration isolated only to the laser marking along the shaft was confirmed and per the product evaluation the ¿discoloration appears to be corrosion but this was not confirmed.¿ a backup device was used to complete the procedure with no patient injuries being reported.Since no patient harm is being alleged and no further harm is anticipated, no further assessment is warranted at this time.
|