It was reported that the procedure was to treat a 90% stenosed, moderately tortuous de novo lesion in the left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery.After pre-dilatation with an unspecified balloon dilatation catheter (bdc), a 2.75x38mm xience xpedition was deployed at 10 atmospheres (atm).After post dilatation was performed with a 2.75x12mm non-abbott bdc at 16 atm, a longitudinal elongation of the 2.75x38mm xience xpedition stent was noted, of 2-3 mm towards ostial lad.The procedure was successfully completed with the xience xpedition 2.75x38mm.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient sequela.No additional information was provided.
|
A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.The reviewer concluded that the media provided shows that there were multiple post dilatation inflations done post stent deployment.The images provided do not clearly show any stent elongation.What is observable is that during the final post dilatation inflations of the balloon, the guiding catheter advanced forward into the ostium of the vessel towards the proximal stent edge while the balloon apparently deflated, strongly implying that the balloon was interacting with the stent struts, possibly ¿snagging¿ on them.This interaction, combined with the advancement of the guiding catheter, could have led to some proximal stent elongation, which was reported but not observed on the provided media.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported stretched stent; however, factors that could contribute to a stretched stent include, but are not limited to, interaction with accessory devices, interaction with anatomy and product placement.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.H6: removed conclusion code 4307.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely the implanted stent interacted with the balloon catheter during post dilation causing the reported stretched stent.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|