As reported by the m3 clinical trial, approximately 1 year and 3 months post procedure, echo showed severe mitral stenosis.The peak mitral velocity was 2.43 m/s, and peak gradient was 23.7mmhg and mean gradient was 14.2 mmhg.No action was taken.The patient required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization.The outcome was not recovered/not resolved.
|
Additional information was received.Per the patient¿s family, the patient was found unresponsive in the bathroom and pronounced dead at home.Death certificate declared cause of death as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.The relationship to the study device, sapien m3, was considered to be not related.
|
Per the instruction for use (ifu), valve stenosis is a potential risk associated with bioprosthetic heart valves.Per the valve academic research consortium (varc), valve stenosis can result from a number of factors, including pannus, calcification, support structure deformation (out-of-round configuration), trauma (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, blunt chest trauma), endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis, and native leaflet prolapse impeding prosthetic leaflet motion.Stenosis of an implanted valve may also be a manifestation of structural valve deterioration (svd).This term refers to changes intrinsic to the valve, and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.There are cases of svd that result in a combination of regurgitation and stenosis.It may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.In these cases, it causes the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Despite multiple requests, additional information was unable to be obtained.The cause for the valve stenosis could not be confirmed.However, pre-existing valvular disease progression and patient factors not provided may be contributing factors.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|