It was reported that during a meniscal repair procedure, the surgeon was utilizing a fiberstitch implant, ar-4570, lot: 19k24.The surgeon was attempting to repair the medial meniscus on a patients left knee.Upon inserting the ar-4570 device utilizing the ar-4505 portal skid into the medial portal, selecting the implant location and beginning the process of repairing the meniscus the following took place: the meniscus was penetrated with the device, and the depth stop set to 18mm.The device was inserted so that the depth stop made contact with the meniscus and then the toggle was rolled toward the surgeon until an audible click was heard and the first implant was deployed.The toggle was then rolled all the way forward and the device was removed from the meniscus.After selecting a second location and penetrating the meniscus, the toggle switch was rolled toward the surgeon for a second time, however the device toggle switch would not roll easily.The surgeon was able to force the toggle switch, with some difficulty, to be rolled completely toward him, in the exact same manner as the first implant.The device did not give an audible click.The surgeon rolled the toggle completely forward and removed the device from the meniscus to reveal that the second implant had not been delivered from the device.The surgeon attempted to roll the toggle switch toward him again with the device in full view.Nothing happened and it appeared the second implant was stuck in the device.Upon removing the device from the patient by pulling back on the device, the suture remained in the patient, attached to the first implant.The surgeon slid the ar-5815 over the suture and cut the remaining suture out of the patient.Attempting a second device ar-4570 lot: 19k24 (second device of the same lot) in the same manner as the first, the exact same steps were repeated and same mode of failure was observed.Both devices were kept and will be returned for evaluation when shipping information is provided.A total of 10 minutes of operative time were taken to utilize both devices and remove them.A competitive product was used in place of the ar-4570 and the procedure was completed as planned.The patient was (b)(6) years old and tissue quality was healthy and not calcified.The repair was taking place on the posterior horn of the medial meniscus.It should be noted that later on in the procedure, qty: 2, ar-4570 lot: 19k24 (third and fourth device from same lot) were used to repair a mid-body tear of the medial meniscus and performing the same steps listed above, the devices functioned as expected and good repair of the meniscus was obtained.Additional information provided 1/3/2019: the first implants were not removed from the capsule and remained in the patient.
|