• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 209999
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Injury (2348)
Event Date 05/17/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of the normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
This pi is for the robot used in the primary procedure patient had a right mako tha surgery on (b)(6) 2019.She started to experience drainage from incision approx.(b)(6) 2019.The incision opened on (b)(6) 2019, patient went to the er and was admitted.Patient was partially revised on (b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged a week after revision and was given antibiotics.On (b)(6) 2019 patient went for a follow-up visit and was told to follow up with her original surgeon.Patient went to see the original surgeon the same day and was admitted to the hospital.During her hospital stay, multiple i&ds were performed approx.(b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2019.Patient continued to experience drainage after being discharged.All components were revised on (b)(6) 2019 and a cement spacer was placed.Another i&d was performed on (b)(6) 2019 and was placed in rehab.On (b)(6) 2019 the spacer was removed, and patient was implanted with competitor product.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Update d2.Reported event: it was reported that ¿patient had a right mako tha surgery on (b)(6) 2019.She started to experience drainage from incision approx.(b)(6) 2019.The incision opened on (b)(6) 2019, patient went to the er and was admitted.Patient was partially revised on (b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged a week after revision and was given antibiotics.On (b)(6) 2019 patient went for a follow-up visit and was told to follow up with her original surgeon.Patient went to see the original surgeon the same day and was admitted to the hospital.During her hospital stay, multiple i&ds were performed approx.(b)(6) 2019, (b)(6) 2019 and on (b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2019.Patient continued to experience drainage after being discharged.All components were revised on (b)(6) 2019 and a cement spacer was placed.Another i&d was performed on (b)(6) 2019 and was placed in rehab.On (b)(6) 2019 the spacer was removed, and patient was implanted with competitor product.¿.Product evaluation and results: review of the case session files was not performed as case session data was not provided.Product history review of the device history records was not completed as the robot number was not provided.Complaint history review a search of the complaint database under device identification pn 209999 reports no similar complaints for tha software - other.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information such as case session data/logs are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
This pi is for the robot used in the primary procedure patient had a right mako tha surgery on (b)(6) 2019.She started to experience drainage from incision approx.(b)(6) 2019.The incision opened on (b)(6) 2019, patient went to the er and was admitted.Patient was partially revised on (b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged a week after revision and was given antibiotics.On (b)(6) 2019 patient went for a follow-up visit and was told to follow up with her original surgeon.Patient went to see the original surgeon the same day and was admitted to the hospital.During her hospital stay, multiple i&ds were performed approx.(b)(6) 2019, (b)(6) 2019 and on (b)(6) 2019.Patient was discharged on (b)(6) 2019.Patient continued to experience drainage after being discharged.All components were revised on (b)(6) 2019 and a cement spacer was placed.Another i&d was performed on (b)(6) 2019 and was placed in rehab.On (b)(6) 2019 the spacer was removed, and patient was implanted with competitor product.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key9607703
MDR Text Key180582522
Report Number3005985723-2020-00051
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486030407
UDI-Public00848486030407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/03/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/20/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number209999
Device Catalogue Number209999
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/27/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient Weight113
-
-