Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2010 due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt), followed by an unsuccessful retrieval attempt on (b)(6) 2015.Patient is alleging migration and fracture.The patient further alleges "pain in abdomen during some physical activity, swelling in leg" and difficulty with "strenuous workouts, abdominal crunches, running." report from ct (computed tomography): "the ivc filter is unchanged in position, the ivc filter is angled with the legs extend outside the ivc.One of the legs of the ivc filter contacts the aortic wall." retrieval report (attempted): "previous imaging is demonstrated the filter being tilted, and with the legs penetrating the ivc wall.Attempted filter retrieval is requested." "an inferior venacavogram was performed, which demonstrates the entire tip of the filter and hook to be outside of the patent ivc lumen, likely incorporated into a wall with scar tissue, or partially chronically penetrating the wall.There are also multiple legs which have penetrated the ivc wall, which was also demonstrated on previous imaging.There is no ivc thrombus and there is no significant ivc narrowing.The tip-deflecting wire and 5 french kumpe catheter were used to attempt to free the tip and hook from the ivc wall, which were unsuccessful.The portion of the upper filter which is in the patent lumen was snared and traction placed on the tip but it could not be freed from the wall, and traction, as the patient significant discomfort.It was determined that the filter was too well incorporated into the ivc wall to be removed." report from ct (computed tomography): "there is an ivc filter.The tip of the filter is approximately 9 mm superior to the right renal vein.The tip of the filter appears to be outside of the lumen of the ivc by approximately 7 mm.Many of the limbs of the ivc filter also extend outside of the lumen of the ivc.2 of the posterior limbs appear to be fractured with one displaced approximately 1.1 cm inferiorly and the other displaced approximately 3.3cm inferiorly.These fractured limbs are noted along the posterior wall of the ivc.Filter is tilted approximately 34 degrees to the right compared to the center line of the ivc.".
|
Device code(s): appropriate term/code not available (3191) was selected for the alleged device perforation and tilt.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: fracture, vena cava (vc) perf/embedment, migration, tilt, abdominal pain, leg swelling, physical limitations.Filter fracture has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Fracture of a filter leg may be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual, stressed position, such as a filter leg penetrating/perforating the ivc; or a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G., a renal vein).Other potential causes of filter fracture may include excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments (including embolized fragments) using endovascular techniques has been reported.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter fracture, filter or filter fragment embolization, trauma to adjacent structures.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter or filter fragment migration and (or) embolization (e.G., movement to the heart or lungs) has been reported.Filter or filter fragment movement has occurred in both the cranial and caudal direction and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters smaller or larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; deployment into thrombus; dislodgement due to large thrombus burdens; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter migration, trauma to adjacent structures.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported abdominal pain, leg swelling, and physical limitations are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, there is no evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|