• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYPOD10-A
Device Problems Failure to Fold (1255); Retraction Problem (1536); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/18/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization in the splenic artery to treat an aneurysm using pod10s and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician advanced the pod10 to the target vessel using the microcatheter.After forming a loop with the pod10, the physician decided to rewind it as the pod10 was not taking good shape in the aneurysm.However, the pod10 became stuck, and the pod10 in unintentionally detached in the microcatheter; subsequently, the microcatheter containing the detached pod10 was removed, and the pod10 was flushed out.The procedure was completed using another pod10, other coils, and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization in the splenic artery to treat an aneurysm using pod10s and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician advanced the pod10 to the target vessel using the microcatheter.After forming a loop with the pod10, the physician decided to rewind it as the pod10 was not taking good shape in the aneurysm.However, the pod10 became stuck, and the pod10 unintentionally detached in the microcatheter; subsequently, the microcatheter containing the detached pod10 was removed, and the pod10 was flushed out.The procedure was completed using another pod10, other coils, and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #01 mfr report: (b)(4) 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem.Results: the pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly and the pull tube was retracted.Kinks were present throughout the length of the pusher assembly.The pull wire was not within the pusher assembly distal detachment tip (ddt) conclusions: evaluation of the returned pod10 revealed that pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.If the pusher assembly is mishandled during use, the pet lock can become inadvertently separated.If the pet lock is separated and the pull wire is retracted, the embolization coil will detach.Further evaluation revealed kinks throughout the length of the pusher assembly.These kinks were likely incidental to the reported complaint.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key9826281
MDR Text Key188524112
Report Number3005168196-2020-00346
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019659
UDI-Public00814548019659
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/12/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRBYPOD10-A
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD10
Device Lot NumberF85915
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/10/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received05/22/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age24 YR
-
-