• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. ARTEMIS EYE TABLET; GWG

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. ARTEMIS EYE TABLET; GWG Back to Search Results
Catalog Number APYTAB
Device Problem Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/27/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2020-00453.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing an endoscopic intracerebral hematoma (ich) evacuation using an artemis eye, artemis eye tablet, energy platform, and bipolar cautery device.During the procedure, the physician used a bipolar cautery on an active bleeder through the working channel of an artemis eye.The energy platform was set to 35w.While delivering energy to the vessel with the bipolar cautery device, a ¿camera connection error¿ message was displayed on the screen of the artemis eye tablet, and the camera view on the artemis eye tablet went black.It was reported that this issue occurred at least three times, and the camera would work once the power was stopped.Subsequently, the physician decided not to use the artemis eye and artemis eye tablet for the remainder of the procedure.The procedure was completed with open surgery to control the patient bleeding.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section has been corrected: 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem although the event summary alleged a deterioration in the characteristics or performance of the device, this event did not and, if it were to recur, it would not cause or contribute to a serious injury or death.Therefore, this is not considered a reportable event.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2020-00453.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing an endoscopic intracerebral hematoma (ich) evacuation using an artemis eye device, energy platform, and bipolar electrocautery device.During the procedure, when the bipolar electrocautery device was activated, the artemis eye tablet live video display temporarily went black.After deactivation of the bipolar electrocautery device, the artemis eye tablet displayed live video from the artemis eye as intended.There was no adverse effect to the patient associated with this incident.The physician decided to convert to open surgery to treat the bleeding and the case was ended.This decision was unrelated to the artemis eye device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTEMIS EYE TABLET
Type of Device
GWG
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key9889873
MDR Text Key187956464
Report Number3005168196-2020-00454
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GWG
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K171332
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/27/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/27/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberAPYTAB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/12/2020
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received01/14/2005
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
-
-