During insertion of a 55 optease retrieval filter with a dilator and sheath introducer into the patient, the tip of the sheath introducer of got split.Therefore, the physician did not use the device to avoid any risks that it would be implanted improperly.There was no issue confirmed with the optease filter.The procedure was completed using a non-cordis device and hemostasis was achieved.There was no reported patient injury.The indication for filter insertion was for deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The dvt documented was diagnosed thru the femoral artery.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped according to the ifu.There were no damages noted to the packaging to the device prior to use.The device was removed from its packaging as per the ifu.The product was not returned for analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 17666027 revealed no anomalies or non-conformance's during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿brite tip/distal tip (optease) frayed/split/torn - in patient¿ could not be confirmed as the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause could not be determined.Vessel characteristics or patient characteristics, although unknown, may have contributed to the reported event.According to the safety information in the instructions for use ¿if strong resistance is met during any stage of the procedure, discontinue the procedure and determine the cause before proceeding.Caution: to avoid damage to the sheath introducer tip, do not withdraw the dilator until the sheath introducer tip is at the desired location in the ivc.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
|
During insertion of a 55 optease retrieval filter with a dilator and sheath introducer into the patient, the tip of the sheath introducer of got split.Therefore, the physician did not use the device to avoid any risks that it would be implanted improperly.There was no issue confirmed with the optease filter.The procedure was completed using a non-cordis device and hemostasis was achieved.There was no reported patient injury.The indication for filter insertion was for deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The dvt documented was diagnosed thru the femoral artery.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped according to the ifu.There were no damages noted to the packaging to the device prior to use.The device was removed from its packaging as per the ifu.The device will not be returned for evaluation as it was discarded due to infectious disease.
|