• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANTEIS S.A. BELOTERO BALANCE; IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANTEIS S.A. BELOTERO BALANCE; IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Occlusion (1984)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This case was assessed as reportable to the fda as the event, left ophthalmic artery occlusion (vascular occlusion) was assessed as meeting the reporting criteria of necessitated medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure.The device history record could not be reviewed as the lot number was not reported.Citation: lee js, kim jy, jung c, woo sj.Iatrogenic ophthalmic artery occlusion and retinal artery occlusion.Progress in retinal and eye research.2020 mar:100848.Doi: 10.1016/j.Preteyeres.2020.100848.
 
Event Description
This case was linked to 3013840437-2020-00045, 3013840437-2020-00046, 3013840437-2020-00047, 3013840437-2020-00048 referring to the same literature article.This literature report from (b)(6) concerns a (b)(6) year-old female patient.She was treated with hyaluronic acid into the nose.After the treatment with hyaluronic acid, the patient experienced left ophthalmic artery occlusion.A wide fundus photograph obtained at the initial visit showed diffuse retinal oedema with "cherry-red spot" sign and multiple segmented retinal arteries.Retinal and choroidal perfusion was severely diminished in fluorescein angiography.Clinical photographs taken on the day of the event shows marked limitation of extraocular muscle movement and ptosis.Anterior segment photograph, obtained one day after the treatment, showed diffuse corneal oedema due to anterior segment ischemia.Anterior segment photograph obtained two months after the event showed that corneal oedema was resolved, but the iris seems to have atrophied and a cataract seems to have developed.The outcome of the events was not reported.In the opinion of the authors, iatrogenic ophthalmic artery occlusion is a rare but devastating ophthalmic disease that may cause sudden and permanent visual loss.Understanding the possible etiologic modalities and pathogenic mechanisms of iatrogenic ophthalmic artery occlusion may prevent its occurrence.Follow-up information was received on (b)(6) 2020: the reporter informed that he did not have the information of all the fillers commercial names, that had been used in this literature case.According to the reporter, after searching the list of fillers they reviewed, they were not able to find the company filler on the list.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BELOTERO BALANCE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANTEIS S.A.
18, chemin des aulx
1228 plan-les-ouates
geneva,
SZ 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANTEIS S.A.
18, chemin des aulx
1228 plan les ouates
geneva,
SZ  
Manufacturer Contact
product safety
6501 six forks road
raleigh, nc 
5828000
MDR Report Key9974768
MDR Text Key191820556
Report Number3013840437-2020-00044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LMH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
P090016
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/17/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/18/2020
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age31 YR
-
-