The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.E3: reporter is a synthes employee.H3, h6: part number: 03.037.030.Lot number: l884761.Manufacturing site: haegendorf.Release to warehouse date: july 26, 2018.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Visual inspection: the helical blade/screw extractor (p/n: 03.037.030, lot number: l884761) was received at us customer quality (cq).Visual inspection of the complaint device showed a mating device (04.038.085) stuck on the distal end.Functional test: a functional assessment was performed with the complaint device.The complaint device could not be disassembled from the returned mating device.The complaint condition can be replicated.Dimensional inspection: no dimensional inspection was performed due to device received condition.Document/specification review: current and manufactured was reviewed.No design issues or discrepancies were identified.Complaint confirmed? yes.Investigation conclusion: this complaint is confirmed as the complaint device cannot be disassembled from the returned mating device.No root cause could definitively be determined for the reported complaint condition.No new, unique or different patient harms were identified as a result of this evaluation.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|